A Precision Digestive Medicine Approach to Persistent Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)
Understanding Persistent IBS
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is one of the most commonly diagnosed gastrointestinal conditions, affecting approximately 7–15% of the global population.¹ Despite its prevalence, many individuals continue to experience fluctuating or persistent symptoms despite dietary modification, reassurance or medication.
While IBS has historically been classified as a functional gastrointestinal disorder, contemporary research recognises it as a disorder of gut–brain interaction with measurable biological correlates — including alterations in motility, microbial ecology, immune signalling and neuro-enteric communication.²
Persistent IBS is rarely arbitrary. It reflects identifiable physiological patterns.
IBS Is a Clinical Pattern — Not a Single Cause
IBS is defined by symptom-based criteria (Rome IV) rather than by mechanism.³ The diagnosis describes what is happening, but not necessarily why.
Current research supports multiple overlapping contributory drivers:
Microbial imbalance within the gut microbiome⁴
Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth⁵
Post-infectious immune activation⁶
Motility disturbance⁷
Visceral hypersensitivity⁸
Low-grade mucosal immune activation⁹
Dysregulation of the gut–brain axis¹⁰
In many cases, IBS represents the cumulative expression of interacting biological processes rather than a single isolated dysfunction.
A precision framework seeks to clarify which mechanisms are clinically relevant in each individual presentation.
Why Symptoms Persist Despite “Normal” Testing
Standard investigations often exclude structural disease but may not evaluate:
Functional motility disturbances
Subtle microbial shifts
Barrier integrity alterations
Neuro-enteric signalling patterns
Research increasingly supports the role of microbiome-host interactions and neuro-immune modulation in IBS pathogenesis.¹¹
Persistent IBS does not imply absence of pathology — it often reflects mechanisms that require more nuanced evaluation.
The Precision Digestive Medicine Framework
Dr. Alain Frabotta applies a staged functional medicine model to persistent IBS presentations.
This approach is systematic, proportionate and clinically reasoned.
Phase 1 – Clinical Mapping
Detailed history and symptom chronology
Subtype identification and pattern recognition
Assessment of dietary triggers and stress physiology
Review of precipitating infection
IBS frequently develops following acute gastroenteritis (post-infectious IBS), with immune and microbial alterations persisting beyond the initial event.⁶
Phase 2 – Targeted Investigations
Where clinically indicated, selective testing may be used to clarify:
Microbial composition patterns
Food sensitivities
Bacterial overgrowth
Inflammatory markers
Digestive function parameters
Investigation is proportionate and hypothesis-driven — not routine or exploratory.
Phase 3 – Structured Intervention
Therapeutic strategies may include:
Microbial modulation
Motility support
Targeted nutritional adjustments
Anti-inflammatory approaches
Gut–brain axis regulation
Evidence supports multimodal, mechanism-targeted strategies rather than reliance on single-modality treatment.¹²
Phase 4 – Stabilisation & Relapse Prevention
Gradual dietary expansion where appropriate
Regulation of stress physiology
Long-term resilience planning
Reduction of relapse risk
The objective is sustained digestive stability and physiological resilience — not short-term symptom suppression.
IBS and the Gut–Brain Axis
The gastrointestinal tract and central nervous system communicate bidirectionally through neural, endocrine and immune pathways.¹⁰
Psychological stress can:
Alter intestinal permeability
Influence microbial composition
Increase visceral sensitivity
Affect motility patterns
Addressing IBS may therefore require attention to both the enteric and the neuroregulatory systems.
When to Consider a Comprehensive Evaluation
You may benefit from a structured assessment if:
IBS symptoms recur despite dietary modification
Bloating remains persistent or disproportionate
Symptoms began following the infection
There is an incomplete response to medication
Food sensitivities expand over time
Digestive symptoms coexist with fatigue or systemic features
A Measured Clinical Approach
Precision Digestive Medicine does not rely on indiscriminate testing or aggressive protocols.
It applies proportionate investigation and structured therapeutic sequencing designed to clarify drivers and restore digestive integrity in a controlled and sustainable manner.
+ REFERENCES
Canavan C, West J, Card T. The epidemiology of irritable bowel syndrome. Clin Epidemiol. 2014;6:71–80. doi:10.2147/CLEP.S40245
Chey WD, Kurlander J, Eswaran S. Irritable bowel syndrome: A clinical review. JAMA. 2015;313(9):949–958. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.0954
Drossman DA, Hasler WL. Rome IV—functional GI disorders: Disorders of gut–brain interaction. Gastroenterology. 2016;150(6):1257–1261. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2016.03.035
Pittayanon R, Lau JT, Yuan Y, et al. Gut microbiota in patients with irritable bowel syndrome: A systematic review. Gastroenterology. 2019;157(1):97–108. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2019.03.049
Pimentel M, Saad RJ, Rao SSC, et al. ACG clinical guideline: Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth. Am J Gastroenterol. 2020;115(2):165–178. doi:10.14309/ajg.0000000000000501
Thabane M, Kottachchi DT, Marshall JK. Systematic review and meta-analysis: The incidence and prognosis of post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology. 2007;133(6):1911–1918. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2007.09.032
Camilleri M. Peripheral mechanisms in irritable bowel syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:1626–1635. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1207061
Ford AC, Talley NJ, Schoenfeld PS, et al. Efficacy of antidepressants and psychological therapies in IBS: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Gut. 2009;58(3):367–378. doi:10.1136/gut.2008.163162
Bashashati M, Rezaei N, Andrews CN, et al. Cytokines and immune activation in IBS: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gut. 2014;63(4):628–638. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2012-303955
Mayer EA. Gut feelings: The emerging biology of gut–brain communication. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;8(8):453–466. doi:10.1038/nrgastro.2011.115
Simrén M, Barbara G, Flint HJ, et al. Intestinal microbiota in functional bowel disorders: A Rome foundation report. Gut. 2013;62(1):159–176. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302167
Ford AC, Lacy BE, Talley NJ. Irritable bowel syndrome. Lancet. 2017;390(10090):167–178. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31558-8
Barbara G, Feinle-Bisset C, Ghoshal UC, et al. The intestinal microenvironment and functional gastrointestinal disorders. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;13(11):691–706. doi:10.1038/nrgastro.2016.138
Oka P, Parr H, Barberio B, et al. Global prevalence of IBS according to Rome III or IV criteria: A meta-analysis. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;5(10):908–917. doi:10.1016/S2468-1253(20)30217-X