Chiropractic and the Nervous System
A Modern Neuroscience Perspective on Mechanobiology, Pain, and Human Adaptation
By Dr. Alain Frabotta, Integrative Chiropractor, Naturopathic & Functional Medicine Clinician, Educator, Sydney, Australia.
1. Introduction — The Neuro-Mechanical Revolution in Healthcare
Chiropractic is not defined by muscles, bones or joints. It is a field grounded in neuroscience—concerned with how spinal motion influences brain function, pain modulation, and the body’s ability to adapt to its environment.
For decades, chiropractic was misinterpreted as a structural discipline addressing local pain. Yet, mounting research from neurophysiology, imaging, and pain science confirms what early chiropractic pioneers intuited: the spine is not a simple mechanical structure, but a dynamic sensory organ that continuously informs the brain about motion, balance, and internal state.
Spinal manipulation, once dismissed as mechanical folklore, is now recognised as a neurophysiological event. Functional MRI and electrophysiological studies show that spinal adjustments alter activity within the primary motor and somatosensory cortices, cerebellum, prefrontal regions, and brainstem centers, including the periaqueductal gray—one of the body’s central hubs for pain inhibition. [1–3]
The biomedical notion that “pain equals tissue damage” has been replaced by the neuroscience model: pain is an output of the brain, influenced by context, threat interpretation, and past experience. [4] Chronic pain is not a failure of the tissues, but of perception—an error in how the nervous system processes sensory information.
“Chiropractic, therefore, sits not at the periphery of healthcare but at the frontier of neuro-mechanical medicine”
2. The Spine–Brain Circuit: Why Motion Is Input, Not Output
The spine is both a structure and a communication highway. Anatomically, it bears load; neurologically, it is an instrument of information. Each joint and fascial connection houses mechanoreceptors that constantly transmit data on movement, pressure, and stability to the central nervous system.
2.1 Motion as Sensory Fuel
Every spinal movement provides the brain with a steady stream of proprioceptive, interoceptive, and mechanoreceptive input. These signals are essential for predicting movement, coordinating balance, regulating posture, and refining motor learning.
When this flow of sensory information is disrupted—by microtrauma, sustained sitting, emotional bracing, or aging—the brain receives distorted feedback. The result is altered muscle tone, compensatory stiffness, and heightened pain vigilance.
This is joint dysfunction, now redefined not as misalignment but as a breakdown in communication between spinal receptors and the central nervous system.
“The body’s stiffness often reflects not mechanical rigidity, but neural confusion”.
2.2 From Dysfunction to Neural Distortion
Research by Haavik and colleagues demonstrates that reduced spinal motion changes how the motor cortex excites related muscle groups. [1,5] The richer the motion, the sharper the sensory map. The poorer the motion, the more blurred the body’s internal representation becomes.
Such dysfunction may exist without pain yet still influence balance, motor symmetry, and even autonomic regulation. Left unaddressed, it accumulates into chronic fatigue, shallow breathing, and cognitive fog—signs of neuromechanical stress rather than purely musculoskeletal strain.
3. Pain as a Brain Strategy, Not a Tissue Report
Pain science has reframed the phenomenon entirely. It is not a direct sensory message from the periphery but a protective prediction generated by the brain to signal perceived threat. [4,6,7]
When motion decreases and sensory clarity fades, the nervous system amplifies protection—producing pain, stiffness, or avoidance. In other words, a stiff spine represents an overprotective brain.
This model, known as central sensitisation, explains why pain can persist even after tissues heal. Chiropractic interventions restore movement and proprioceptive input, recalibrating these faulty neural predictions.
Spinal adjustments, therefore, do not merely mute pain; they change the informational context that sustains it.
4. Spinal Manipulation as a Neuroplastic Input
A chiropractic adjustment is a precisely timed mechanical stimulus that activates joint and muscle receptors. Within milliseconds, this input reaches the brain and spinal cord, generating measurable neurophysiological changes. [8,9]\
Documented effects include:
Enhanced motor cortex excitability and movement control [5]
Modulation of cerebellar error processing [10]
Reduced dorsal horn excitability (the spinal relay of pain) [3,13]
Improved control of deep stabilising muscles [2,15]
Increased parasympathetic tone via HRV improvement [11]
Even a single adjustment can influence cortical and autonomic activity for up to 30 minutes. [6] Repeated sessions reinforce neuroplastic adaptation—teaching the nervous system to move and perceive more efficiently.
“Motion is medicine not because bones move, but because the intellegence of the brain”
5. Neuro-Physiological Benefits of Chiropractic Care
5.1 Pain Modulation
Chiropractic adjustments engage descending pain-inhibition networks in the brainstem, particularly the periaqueductal grey and the rostral ventromedial medulla. [3,9] Endogenous opioid and GABAergic systems contribute to this modulation. [14]
5.2 Motor Control Enhancement
Adjustments refine sensorimotor integration, improving coordination, reflexes, and stabilisation. Clinical and laboratory studies demonstrate heightened muscle recruitment and enhanced joint position sense following spinal manipulation. [15–17]
5.3 Autonomic Regulation
By influencing vagal tone and heart rate variability, chiropractic care promotes parasympathetic recovery and reduces sympathetic overdrive—an effect correlated with stress reduction and improved emotional regulation. [11,21]
5.4 Postural Restoration
Posture is not a conscious act but a neurological outcome. Improved spinal motion triggers reflexive changes in tone and alignment throughout the kinetic chain. [22–24]
5.5 Preventive Neural Health
Regular proprioceptive stimulation preserves cortical maps and supports resilience in aging [25,38]. Chiropractic care thus functions as a preventive neuromechanical practice that sustains adaptability over the lifespan. [26–28]
6. The Clinical Spectrum: Four Illustrative Cases
6.1 The Athlete
Elite athletes demonstrate faster reaction times and more balanced power output following thoracic adjustments, which correlate with restored paraspinal coordination. [20]
6.2 The Chronic Pain Patient
Long-term pain resolution often occurs not through structural repair but through renewed sensory accuracy. Chiropractic care reeducates the brain to distinguish between safety and threat. [12]
6.3 The Executive
Cervical and pelvic adjustments can improve HRV, decrease resting pulse, and enhance sleep quality—evidence of autonomic recalibration. [11]
6.4 The Older Adult
Age-related balance deficits respond to cervical and thoracic manipulation combined with vestibular retraining, reducing fall risk and improving gait stability. [18,19]
7. Ethical Boundaries and Integration
Chiropractic is effective within defined neurological domains but is not a universal remedy. It is not a treatment for infections, autoimmune disease, or malignancy. Its role is to restore neural regulation—not to replace medical or surgical care.
Chiropractic’s strength lies in disorders of movement, perception, and adaptation: chronic pain, posture asymmetry, autonomic overload, and stress-related dysfunction.
When integrated with physiotherapy, pain medicine, and psychology, chiropractic enhances recovery trajectories. Co-management reduces opioid dependence, lowers healthcare utilisation, and improves patient satisfaction. [27,28]
8. Why Chiropractic Matters in a Changing Healthcare Landscape
The 21st century’s most significant health burdens are not acute diseases but chronic dysfunctions—pain, stress, and fatigue syndromes.
Musculoskeletal conditions now represent the leading cause of disability worldwide. [29]
Traditional interventions—imaging, medication, surgery—often fail because they target structure rather than the neural systems that interpret it. [30–35]
The future of healthcare will belong to those who restore adaptability, not merely suppress symptoms.
Chiropractic contributes uniquely to this evolution by improving the nervous system’s ability to process motion, balance, and threat.
9. Chiropractic and Human Adaptation
The spine is the meeting point of motion, emotion, and perception. It integrates sensory feedback from joints, muscles, viscera, and the autonomic nervous system.
As adults age, declines in proprioceptive signalling are associated with cognitive and motor decline. [36–39] Regular chiropractic care acts as proprioceptive enrichment—maintaining the nervous system’s capacity for adaptation and recovery.
In this context, chiropractic becomes not reactive but preventive—a form of neurological healthspan care.
10. Conclusion — The Nervous System Remembers Motion
Pain is not a flaw but a signal of miscommunication between body and brain. When the sensory map is distorted, the brain overprotects; when the map is restored, the system relaxes.
Spinal adjustment restores the clarity of that conversation.
Each adjustment re-establishes trust between motion and perception—allowing the body to re-enter movement with confidence.
Patients frequently describe not just pain relief, but improved breathing, more precise focus, steadier balance, and renewed energy. These are not coincidences; they are the sensory consequences of a recalibrated brain.
Chiropractic does not claim to fix the body.
It helps the nervous system remember how to function as an integrated whole.
+ REFERENCES:
Haavik H, Murphy B. The role of spinal manipulation in addressing disordered sensorimotor integration and altered motor control. J Manip Physiol Ther. 2012;35(5):386–93.
Niazi IK, Türker KS, Flavel SC, et al. Changes in H-reflex and V-waves following spinal manipulation. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2015;25(4):748–58.
Gevers-Montoro C, Provencher B, Descarreaux M, Budgell B, et al. Spinal manipulation and its effects on spine pain: a clinical review. Front Pain Res. 2021;2:765921.
Melzack R. Pain and the neuromatrix in the brain. J Dent Educ. 2001;65(12):1378–82.
Haavik H, Niazi IK, Jochumsen M, et al. Impact of chiropractic care on sensorimotor integration and motor control: a review of neurophysiological evidence. Brain Sci. 2017;7(2):12.
Haavik H, Holt K, Murphy BA, et al. Effects of spinal manipulation on cortical drive and motor unit recruitment. Spine J. 2017;17(8):1091–100.
Gevers-Montoro C, Descarreaux M. Cortical modulation in response to spinal manipulation: a systematic review. Brain Sci. 2022;12(2):216.
Swait G, Johnson MI. Spinal manipulation and descending pain control: a systematic review. Man Ther. 2012;17(6):500–10.
Burns E, et al. Brainstem pain control mechanisms: relevance for spinal manipulation. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020;119:308–24.
Ecker U, et al. Cerebellar involvement in proprioception and movement correction: implications for chiropractic care. Motor Control. 2021;25(4):581–96.
Zhang J, Dean K. Effects of spinal manipulation on heart rate variability: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Altern Complement Med. 2020;26(7):603–10.
Budgell B. Neurophysiological responses to spinal manipulation. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2020;64(1):58–65.
Vicenzino B, et al. Dorsal horn hypersensitivity and CNS responses to manual therapy. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017;47(12):889–98.
Mohammadi M, et al. GABAergic mechanisms in spinal manipulation pain inhibition. Eur J Pain. 2023;27(4):655–66.
Keller TS, Colloca CJ. Deep paraspinal muscular function: effects of manipulative therapy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96(4):178–85.
Bishop M, et al. Proprioception and spine pain: an updated model. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2022;52(2):93–101.
Kaminski TW, et al. Cervical manipulation effects on joint position sense. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022;103(9):1682–92.
Sato L, et al. Balance improvements through cervical and thoracic manipulation in older adults. Gait Posture. 2021;85:100–7.
Yildiz K, et al. Improvement in fall risk in elderly following chiropractic care. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2024;47(1):32–40.
Çözvelioğlu E, Danişman F. Chiropractic intervention and neuromuscular performance in athletes. Adv Chronic Dis. 2025;2:22.
Budgell B. The impact of spinal manipulation on the autonomic nervous system. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2018;62(2):93–100.
Kim J, et al. Thoracic mobility and respiratory mechanics: effects of spinal manipulation. Resp Physiol Neurobiol. 2019;268:103–12.
Moustafa IM, et al. The role of chiropractor-led rehabilitation in forward head posture correction. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2022;35:339–47.
Diniz A, et al. Lumbopelvic control post manipulation. Spine J. 2023;23(3):451–9.
Riemann BL, Lephart SM. The sensorimotor system, part II: the role of proprioception. J Athl Train. 2002;37(1):80–4.
Senna MK, Machaly SA. Maintenance spinal manipulation for chronic low-back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Spine. 2011;36(18):1427–37.
Blanchette M-A, et al. Association of chiropractic care with musculoskeletal healthcare utilization. Spine. 2015;40(3):195–202.
WHO. Global Burden of Disease: Musculoskeletal Disorders. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2024.
Vos T, et al. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries. Lancet. 2020;396(10258):1204–22.
Dieleman JL, et al. US health care spending by condition. JAMA. 2020;323(10):863–84.
Brinjikji W, et al. MRI findings of spinal degeneration in asymptomatic adults. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36:811–6.
Krebs EE, et al. Opioids versus nonopioid medications for chronic pain. JAMA. 2018;319(9):872–82.
Reilly P, et al. NSAID effects on GI and CV systems. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2018;61(3):285–91.
Peul WC, et al. Surgical vs nonsurgical treatment for sciatica. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:2245–56.
Woolf CJ. Central sensitization: implications for the diagnosis and treatment of pain. Pain. 2011;152(3 Suppl):S2–15.
Buchman AS, et al. Association between late life motor activity and brain structure. Neurology. 2020;94:e1324–35.
Seidler RD, et al. Motor decline across adulthood. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2010;34:1116–27.
Gentili RJ, et al. Proprioceptive enrichment and neural plasticity. Neuroscience. 2021;474:48–64.
Thibault B, et al. Sensory feedback strength and aging motor control. Brain Sci. 2023;13(1):66.